Legal Implications of Not Performing Roya Fiduciary Guarantee by the Creditor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i2.128Keywords:
Fiduciary Guarantee, Leasing, RoyaAbstract
The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the obstacles of the creditor not doing roya fiduciary when the debtor's debt is paid off, legal protection to the debtor if the creditor does not do roya fiduciary guarantee and the legal implications of not doing roya fiduciary at PT Verena Multi Finance Medan City. This type of research is normative juridical legal research, the nature of the research is descriptive analysis, the techniques used are library research and field research. The results of the study state that the obstacles of creditors in carrying out fiduciary security roya are constraints on the removal system and constraints on legal arrangements. Legal protection to the debtor if the creditor does not make a fiduciary guarantee roya is stated in Article 25 paragraph (3) of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law that upon the abolition of the fiduciary guarantee the fiduciary recipient notifies the Fiduciary Registration Office of the abolition of the fiduciary guarantee by attaching a statement regarding the abolition of debt. The legal implication of not doing fiduciary roya at PT Verena Multi Finance Medan City is that the object of fiduciary guarantee that has not been royaed cannot be used as collateral if the object of the guarantee is to be re-guaranteed as an object of fiduciary guarantee, then the object must be royaed first.
References
Alfitra, D. P. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Penghapusan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Secara Elektronik. Recital Review, 3(1), 122–149.
Ghoni, A. (2018). Implementasi Penyelesaian Hukum Atas Eksekusi Jaminan Dalam Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 1(2), 60–83.
Kristiyanti, C. T. S. (2022). Hukum perlindungan konsumen. Sinar Grafika.
Manurung, D. R. N. N. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Terhadap Parate Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia. Tadulako University.
Mawanda, M. K., & Muhshi, A. (2019). Perlindungan hukum mitra ojek daring di Indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 6(1), 33–52.
Meiyudianti, N. (2018). Akibat Hukum Kelalaian Kreditur Dalam Melakukan Roya Atas Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen, 2(1).
Rendra, O., Bachtiar, M., & Hasanah, U. (n.d.). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Fidusia Ulang Objek Tanpa Roya Fidusia Berdasarkan Undang–Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 1–14.
Subagiyo, D. T. (2019). Legal Standing Debitor Selama Menguasai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Law Review, 18(2), 132–164.
Winstar, Y. N., & Harahap, I. (2017). Pelaksanaan Roya Atas Benda Bergerak di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 16(2), 219–235.
Yasir, M. (2016). Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 3, 75–92.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kanishka Bhuller, Tan Kamello, Rosnidar Sembiring, Yefrizawati Yefrizawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.