An Analysis of Alleged Discrimination by Telkom Group Against Netflix in Internet Service Provision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v4i1.409Keywords:
Netflix, Telkom Indonesia, Net NeutralityAbstract
This study analyzes the alleged discriminatory practices by PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Persero) Tbk and PT Telekomunikasi Seluler (Telkom Group) against Netflix in the provision of internet access services. The issue arose when Telkom Group blocked access to Netflix in 2016, citing concerns over inappropriate content and consumer protection. However, similar platforms such as HOOQ, Viu, and Iflix were not subjected to the same restrictions, raising concerns about unequal treatment and potential anti-competitive behavior. Using a normative juridical approach combined with statutory, conceptual, and comparative methods, this research examines the case through the lens of Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and Law No. 36 of 1999 on Telecommunications. The analysis incorporates the principle of non-discrimination and the "essential facilities" doctrine to assess whether the actions of Telkom Group potentially violated competition law. Although the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU) concluded there was no legal violation, this decision remains controversial and highlights the need for stronger regulatory frameworks and clearer enforcement mechanisms in Indonesia’s digital economy. Ensuring fair and non-discriminatory access to digital services is vital for fostering innovation, consumer choice, and a competitive ecosystem.
References
Arifin, Z., Amirullah, M., & Nugroho, T. (2024). Praktik Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Di Sektor Jasa Konstruksi. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 7(2), Article 2. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Julr.V7i2.8368
Fadhilah, M. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) Dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorial. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(1), Article 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.25072/Jwy.V3i1.217
Karina, A. D. (2019). Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Di Pasar Tradisional. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 3(2), 55–67. Https://Doi.Org/10.56444/Jidh.V3i2.1360
Mantili, R., Kusmayanti, H., & Afriana, A. (2016). Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal Of Law), 3(1), 116–132.
Mustamin, M. (2024). Analisis Hukum Anti Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Asy-Syarikah: Jurnal Lembaga Keuangan, Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 6(1), Article 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.47435/Asy-Syarikah.V6i1.2664
Pamungkas, S. W. (2021). Implementasi Net Neutrality Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Ite. Jurnal Komunikasi Profesional, 5(3), 244–259. Https://Doi.Org/10.25139/Jkp.V5i3.3672
Permana, R. B. (2020). Network Neutrality: Standar Baru Dalam Tata Kelola Internet? Old Website Of Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 31(3), Article 3. Https://Doi.Org/10.22146/Jmh.30934
Rumatiga, H. (2021). Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dalam Perdagangan Bahan Pangan Dikaitkan Dengan Uu No. 5 Tahun 1999 | Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law. Https://Ojs.Unida.Ac.Id/Livinglaw/Article/View/4201
Susanto, I., Meilia, M., & Anisa, D. (2019). Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Di Indonesia Menurut Hukum Ekonomi Islam Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Syi`Ar Iqtishadi : Journal Of Islamic Economics, Finance And Banking, 3(2), 80–101. Https://Doi.Org/10.35448/Jiec.V3i2.6593
Tiara, C. O. (2017). Indikasi Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dalam Aspek Tata Niaga Perdagangan Sapi Impor. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 46(4), Article 4. Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Mmh.46.4.2017.343-348
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alvin Kurniawan, Edwin Setiadi, Leonardo Leonardo, Udin Silalahi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.