Competence of The Authority of Military Police Investigators on Money Laundering Criminal Cases in Connection Cases

Competence of The Authority of Military Police Investigators on Money Laundering Criminal Cases in Connection Cases

Authors

  • Sudarma Setiawan Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Madiasa Ablisar Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Sunarmi Sunarmi Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Mahmud Mulyadi Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i6.175

Keywords:

Competence Authority, Military Police Investigator, Money Laundering Case

Abstract

The investigation of money laundering cases against connexity cases whose perpetrators are "unscrupulous" Indonesian National Army and civilians, currently there is a Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021 which provides legal certainty for Military Police Investigators to be able to investigate money laundering criminal case against "unscrupulous" Indonesian army who are included as "justiabelen" within the scope of military justice. Previously, the money laundering criminal case could not be continued due to the existence of the Explanation of Article 74 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Laundering Crimes. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the competence of the authority of military police investigators in the case of money laundering crimes in connexity cases. This research is a descriptive normative legal research, using a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of the study concluded that the Military Justice law can override general laws. The competence of the investigative authority carried out by the Military Police Investigator in the money laundering criminal case against the investigation of the concurrency case can be carried out based on the Decision of the Indonesian Constitutional Court No. 15 / PUU-XIX / 2021, where the Military Police Investigator has obtained mandatory authority based on the law.

References

Ariman, M. R., & Raghib, F. (2015). Hukum Pidana. Malang: Setara Press.

Interview with Puspomad Investigator who investigated the tipikor case against Suspect "T.H".

Kanter, E. Y., & Sianturi, S. R. (2002). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia dan penerapannya. Storia Grafika.

Marbun, R. (2014). Grand Design Politik Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 1(3).

Republic of Indonesia, Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XIX/2021, dated June 29, 2021, pp. 54-55.

Republic of Indonesia, Police Report Number LP-11/A-XII/2015/Puspomad, dated December 04, 2015 and Case File Number BP-03/A-03/V/2015/Puspomad, dated May 27, 2016 An. Tk. Brigjend TNI "T.H" in relation to the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 363K/MIL/2017 jo. Decision of the High Military Court II Jakarta Number 23-K/PMT-II/AD/VII/2016 An. Defendant "T.H".

Republic of Indonesia, Supreme Court Decision Number 363K/MIL/2017 jo. Decision of the High Military Court II Jakarta Number 23-K/PMT-II/AD/VII/2016 An. Defendant "T.H".

Published

2023-06-03

How to Cite

Setiawan, S., Ablisar, M., Sunarmi, S., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Competence of The Authority of Military Police Investigators on Money Laundering Criminal Cases in Connection Cases. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(6), 512–521. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i6.175

Issue

Section

Artikel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 
Loading...